Law in Context for the Digital Age

Pompeu Casanovas   | Bio
La Trobe University
Jianfu Chen | Bio
La Trobe University
David Wishart | Bio
La Trobe University
Share:

Abstract

We introduce both the new inception of Law in Context - A Socio-legal Journal and the continuing issue of LiC 36 (1). The editorial provides a brief historical account of the Journal since its inception in the early 1980s, in the context of the evolution of the Law & Society movement. It also describes the changes produced in the digital age by the emergence of the Web of Data, Big Data, and the Internet of Things. The convergence between Law & Society and Artificial Intelligence & Law is also discussed. Finally, we introduce briefly the articles included in this issue.  

 

 

 

 

References

  1. Andrighetto, G., Governatori, G., Noriega, P. and van der Torre, L.W. 2013. Normative multi-agent systems (Vol.4). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/dfu-complete/dfu-vol4-complete.pdf Accessed 30/8/2019.
  2. Arup, C. 2000. The New World Trade Organization Agreements. Globalizing Law Through Services and Intellectual Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bartie, S. 2010. "A full day's work: a study of Australia's first legal scholarly community." U. Queensland LJ, 29 (1): 67-99.
  4. Berghel, H. 2017. Equifax and the latest round of identity theft roulette. Computer, 50 (12): 72-76.
  5. Cadwallader, C. 2019. Ted Talk, “Facebook’s role in Brexit, and the threat to democracy”, 19 April. https://www.ted.com/talks/carole_cadwalladr_facebook_s_role_in_brexit_and_the_threat_to_democracy?language=en Accessed 30/8/2019.
  6. Cadwalladr, C. (2018). Exposing Cambridge Analytica: 'It's been exhausting, exhilarating, and slightly terrifying'. The Guardian, 28 September. https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2018/sep/29/cambridge-analytica-cadwalladr-observer-facebook-zuckerberg-wylie Accessed 30/8/2019.
  7. Casanovas, P., Palmirani, M., Peroni, S., van Engers, T. and Vitali, F. 2016. “Semantic web for the legal domain: the next step”. Semantic Web Journal 7 (3): 213-227.
  8. Chaitin, G.J. 1994. The limits of mathematics. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/pdf/chao-dyn/9407003.pdf Accessed 30/8/2019.
  9. Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B.G., 2002. The internationalization of palace wars. Lawyer, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Dézalay, Y. and Garth, B.G.1996. Dealing in virtue: International commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Douglas, R. 2013. “Foreword”. Socio-legality: An Odyssey of Ideas and Context. Law in Context 29 (2): ix-xii.
  12. Dryzek J.S. and Niemeyer N. “Deliberative Turns” (2009). In J. Dryzek (ed.) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford Scholarship Online, pp. 3–17.
  13. Erlanger, H., Garth, B., Larson, J., Mertz, E., Nourse, V., Wilkins, D. 2005. “Is it Time for a New Legal Realism?” Wisconsin Law Review, (2): 335‐363.
  14. Eveleth, R. 2019. “Ideas. When Futurism let to Fascism —and why it could happen again”. 18 April 2019. Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/italy-futurist-movement-techno-utopians/ Accessed 30/8/2019.
  15. Falk Moore, S. 2001. “Certainties undone: Fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949‐1999.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7 (1): 95-116.
  16. GDPR, 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj accessed 25/8/2019 Accessed 30/8/2019.
  17. Harari, Y.N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030133627
  18. Kerruish, V. 1989. "In Memory of Ernest Kingston Braybrooke." UW Austl. L. Rev. 19 (2): 198-199.
  19. Kirby, M. 2012. "A.R. Blackshield and Realism in Australian Constitutional Law." Macquarie LJ 11: 7-21.
  20. Lewis, S.L., and Maslin, M.A 2015. "Defining the anthropocene." Nature 519 (7542): 171-179.
  21. LiC (1983). Editorial. Law in Context. A Socio-legal Journal 1: iii.
  22. Lieberman, D. 2012. “Why Law: Philip Selznick and the Study of Normative Systems.” Issues Legal Scholarship, 10 (1): 33-42.
  23. Mathews, R. 2017. “Interrogating ‘Privacy’ in a World Brimming with High Political Entanglements, Surveillance, Interdependence & Interconnections”. In R. Mathews (ed.) Special Issue: Privacy and Security of Medical Information. Health and Technology (7): 265-322.
  24. McCarty, L.T. 2019. “Finding the Right Balance in Artificial Intelligence and Law”. In Bartfield, W. and Pagallo, U. (eds.) Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham, UK, and Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 55-87.
  25. Miles, T.J. and Sunstein, C. R. 2008. “The New Legal Realism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 75 (2): 831-851.
  26. Mittelstadt, B.D. and Floridi, L. (eds.). 2016. The ethics of biomedical big data. Law Governance and Technology Series, vol. 29. Dartmouth: Springer.
  27. Neal, D. 2013. "Law and power-livin'in the'70s." Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal, 29: 99-136.
  28. Nonet, P. and Selznick, P. 1978. Law and Society in Transition. Toward Responsive Law. New York: Octagon Books.
  29. Nourse, V. and Shaffer, G. 2009. “Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory.” Cornell Law Review 95 (1): 61-137.
  30. O’Neil, C. 2016. Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (First edit). New York: Crown.
  31. Pagallo, U., Palirani, M., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Villata, S. (eds.) 2018. AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. AICOL International Workshops 2015-2017. LNAI 10791, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  32. Petersen, K. (ed.) (2013). Socio-legality: An Odyssey of Ideas and Context. Special Issue. Law in Context 29 (2): 1-163.
  33. Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., and Rodríguez-Doncel, V. (2019). Linked Democracy. Foundations, methodologies, applications. Cham: Springer Nature.
  34. Selznick, P. 2003. “'Law in Context' Revisited.” Journal of Law and Society, 30 (2): 177-186.
  35. Shadbolt, N. and Hampson, R. (2018). The Digital Ape: How to Live (in Peace) with Smart Machines. London, Melbourne: Pan Macmillan.
  36. Snyder, T. (2017). On Tyranny. Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. New York: Tim Duggan Books.
  37. Succi, S., and Coveney, P.V. 2019. "Big data: the end of the scientific method?" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 377, 2142: 20180145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0145
  38. Swan, M., 2013. “The quantified self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery.” Big data, 1 (2): 85-99.
  39. Taleb, N. N. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
  40. The Guardian, 2019. “Australian National University hit by huge data breach¨, 4 June. https://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/message-from-the-vice-chancellor
  41. UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy. 2018. A/73/45712. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy. 17 October.
  42. UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy. 2019. A/HRC/40/63. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy. 27 February.
How to Cite
1.
Casanovas P, Chen J, Wishart D. Law in Context for the Digital Age. LiC [Internet]. 2019Aug.30 [cited 2020Feb.21];36(1):3-11. Available from: https://journals.latrobe.edu.au/index.php/law-in-context/article/view/91

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel