Litigating Racial Profiling: The Use of Statistical Data

Tamar Hopkins  
PhD candidate, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia


The use of statistical data to prove racial discrimination by police in individual cases is relatively novel in Australia.  Based on a survey of international strategies, this article argues that statistical and social science data can play three critical evidential roles in litigation. Firstly, it can form part of the social context evidence used to influence the inferences that can be drawn from other evidence led in a case.  Secondly it can influence the cogency of the evidence required for claimants to meet the standard of proof, and thirdly, it can be used to shift the burden of proof.  Using these evidential methods, evidence of institutional racism can be used to assist in making findings of discrimination in individual cases. This article speculates on the role that statistics could have played in the Haile-Michael race discrimination claim that settled in 2013, and in the 2019 inquest into the death of Tanya Day.


  1. Agarwal, R., Lalani, F., and Boutilier, M. 2018. "Lessons from Latif: Guidance on the Use of Social Science Expert Evidence in Discrimination Cases." Canadian Bar Review, 96 (1): 36-56.
  2. Barnes, G. 2019. “Lifetime Traffic Penalty Com-parison, Briefing Note.” WA Police, released under FOI to Guardian Australia, 13 February 2019.
  3. Baumgartner, F., Epp, D., and Shoub, K. 2018. Suspect Citizens, What 20 Million Traffic Stops Tell Us about Policing and Race. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Boon-Kuo, L., Brodie, A., Keene-McCann, J., Sentas, V., and Weber, L. 2020. “Policing biosecurity: police enforcement of special measures in New South Wales and Victoria during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 33 (1): 76-88.
  5. Bonilla-Silva, E. 2014. Racism without Racists. Maryland USA, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, Fourth Ed.
  6. Bowling, B. and Phillips, C. 2007. "Disproportion-ate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search." Modern Law Review, 70 (6): 936-961.
  7. Burtis, M., Gelbach, J., and Kobayashi, B. 2017. "Error Costs, Legal Standards of Proof and Statistical Significance." Faculty Scholarship 1754: 1-40.
  8. Carmichael, S. and Hamilton, C. 1967. Black Pow-er, The Politics of Liberation. NY, USA: Random House.
  9. de Plevitz, L. 2003. “Briginshaw 'Standard of Proof' in Anti-Discrimination Law: 'Pointing with a Wavering Finger.'” Melbourne University Law Review, 27 (2): 308-333.
  10. Dixon, D., Bottomley, A. K., Coleman, C. A., Gill, M., and Wall, D. 1989. "Rules and Reality in the Construction and Regulation of Police Suspicion." International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 17: 185-206.
  11. Dunn, C. and Shames, M. 2019. Stop and Frisk in the de Blasio Era. New York Civil Liberties Union, March 2019.
  12. Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., and Haider-Markel, D. 2014 Pulled over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Faruqi, O. 2020. "Compliance Fines under the Microscope". The Saturday Paper, online, 18 April
  14. Foster, L., Jacobs, L., and Siu, B. 2016. "Race Data and Traffic Stops in Ottawa, 2013-2015 : A Report on Ottawa and the Police Districts." Submit-ted to the Ottawa Police Board.
  15. Fridell, L. 2004. "By the Numbers: A Guide for Analyzing Race Data from Vehicle Stops." Police Executive Research Forum.
  16. Gordon, I. 2012a. First Report of Professor Gordon (Redacted) Hail-Michael v Konstantinidis VID 969 of 2010, 11 September 2012, 23.
  17. Gordon, I. 2012b. 2nd Expert Report of Ian Gordon, Filed in Haile-Michael & Ors in the Federal Court of Australia on 13/11/2012.
  18. Goris, I. 2009. Profiling Minorities: A Study of Stop and Search Practices in Paris (Open Justice Society). Accessed 115/11/2020
  19. Hall, Stuart. 1999. “From Scarman to Stephen Lawrence.” History Workshop Journal, 48: 187-197.
  20. Hopkins, T. 2007. “Complaints against police behavior in Flemington.” Alternative Law Journal, 32, (1): 32-36.
  21. Hopkins, T. 2017. Monitoring Racial Profiling Introducing a Scheme to Prevent Unlawful Stops and Searches by Victoria Police A Report of the Police Stop Data Working Group. Police Stop Data Working Group.
  22. Tamar Hopkins (2021) “Litigating racial profiling: examining the evidence for institutional racial profiling by police against African-Australians in Flemington, Victoria” Australian Journal of Human Rights, 26 (2): 209-226, DOI: 10.1080/1323238X.2021.1872132
  23. Lamberth, J. and Buckman, W. 2001. "Challenging Racial Profiles: Attacking Jim Crow on the Interstate". Rutgers Race and the Law Review, 3: 83-115.
  24. Marlow, A. and Loveday, B. 2000. “Race, Policing and the Need for Leadership” in After Macpherson, Policing After the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. Dorset, UK: Russell House Publishing.
  25. Miller, J. and MVA. 2000. Profiling Populations Available for Stops and Searches. UK: Home Office.
  26. Moeckli, Daniel. 2007. “Stop and Search Under the Terrorism Act 2000: A Comment on R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis”. The Modern Law Review, 70 (4): 659-670.
  27. Open Society Justice Initiative. 2016. “Seydi and Others v France: Application”. 8 May 2016,
  28. Sentas, V. 2014. Traces of Terror Counter-Terrorism Law, Policing, and Race. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  29. Sentas, V. and Pandolfini, C. 2017. Policing Young People in NSW A Study of the Suspect Targeting Management Plan, NSW: Youth Justice Coalition.
  30. Sheppard, C. and Chabot, M. L. 2018. "Obstacles to Crossing the Discrimination Threshold: Connecting Individual Exclusion to Group-Based Inequalities." Canadian Bar Review, 96 (1): 1-35.
  31. Shiner, M. et al. 2008, The Colour of Injustice, ‘Race’, Drugs and Law Enforcement in England and Wales, Stopwatch, Release.
  32. Shiner, M. and Thornbury, P. 2019. Regulating Police Stop and Search: An Evaluation of the Northamptonshire Police Reasonable Grounds Panel, Open Society Justice Initiative.
  33. Siu, B. 2017. “Defining the Concept of Racial Pro-filing: A Discussion”. Canadian Diversity, 14(1): 11-13.
  34. Skolnick, J. H. and Fyfe, J.J. 1993. Above the Law, Police and the Excessive Use of Force New York: The Free Press.
  35. Stuart, F. 2016. Down, out and under Arrest. Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Tanovich, D. M. (2017). Applying the racial pro-filing correspondence test. Criminal Law Quarterly, 64(3-4): 359-383.
  37. Taylor, K-Y. 2016. From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Chicago, USA: Haymarket Books.
  38. Van Maanen, J. 1978. ‘The Asshole’ in Tim New-burn (ed) 2005, Policing, Key Readings. Oxford-shire, UK: Routledge.
  39. Weber, L. 2020. You’re Going to Be in the System Forever: Policing, Risk and Belonging in Greater Dandenong. Melbourne: Monash University.
  40. Williams, P. and Clarke B. 2016. Dangerous Associations: Joint Enterprise, Gangs and Racism, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
  41. Williams, P. 2018. Being Matrixed: The (Over) Po-licing of Gang Suspects in London London, UK: StopWatch.
  42. Wortley, S. and Owusu-Bempah, A. 2011. “The Usual Suspects: Police Stop and Search Practices in Canada”. Policing and Society, 21 (4): 395-407.
  43. Wortley, S. 2019. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Street Checks Report (Nova Scotia Human Rights Com-mission, March 2019)
  44. Wortley, S. and Jung, M. 2020. Racial Disparity in Arrests and Charges Toronto, Ontario Human Rights Commission.
How to Cite
Hopkins T. Litigating Racial Profiling: The Use of Statistical Data. LiC [Internet]. 2021Sep.3 [cited 2022May24];37(2):37-3. Available from:

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel