Equality and Anti-Discrimination Legislation: An Uneasy Relationship

Margaret Thornton   | Bio
Emerita Professor and Public Policy Fellow in the ANU College of Law. Australian National University, Canberra.
Share:

Abstract

Despite the rhetoric of equality that infuses anti-discrimination legislation, a close analysis reveals that it is in-equality that is invariably privileged. With reference to the Australian example, this introductory article will show how the paradox is played out at multiple sites in terms of both form and substance, such as through the individualism and confidentiality of the complaint-based mechanism. A striking exclusion from the legislation is the attribute of class, the most significant manifestation of social inequality, which remains ineffable even when it significantly shapes other attributes. The prevailing political backdrop of neoliberalism plays a significant role in promoting inequality through competition policy and profit maximisation. Powerful corporations not only endeavour to resist transparency, but they also tend to oppose proactive measures in favour of substantive equality. The contradictions of anti-discrimination legislation thereby sustain in-equality while simultaneously espousing the rhetoric of equality.

References

1. Afrey, S. 2019. Intersectional Discrimination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Allen, D. and Blackham, A. 2019. “Under Wraps: Secrecy, Confidentiality and the Enforcement of Equality Law in Australia and the United Kingdom”. Melbourne University Law Review, 43 (2): 384-422.
3. Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
4. Aristotle. 1959. Politics. Ed. and trans. John Warrington. London: Everyman’s Library, Dent.
5. Australian Human Rights Commission. 2020. Respect@Work: National Inquiry into Sexual Harassment in Australian Workplaces. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/sex-discr imination/publications/respectwork-sexual-ha rassment-national-inquiry-report-2020 Accessed 12/12/2020.
6. Australian Human Rights Commission. 2019. 2018-19 Complaint Statistics https://human rights.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-10/AHRC _AR_2019-20_Complaint_Stats_FINAL .pdf
7. Bacchi, C. 2000. “The Seesaw Effect: Down goes Affirmative Action, up comes Workplace Diversity”. Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 5 (2): 64-83.
8. Bailey, P. 2009. The Human Rights Enterprise in Australia and Internationally. Chatswood, N.S.W.Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths.
9. Bergmann, B. R. 1996. In Defense of Affirmative Action. New York, USA: Basic Books.
10. Brown, W. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1995.
11. Callinicos, A. 2000. Equality. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
12. Clayton, S. D. and Crosby, F. J. 1992. Justice, Gender, and Affirmative Action. Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press.
13. Commonwealth of Australia. 2009. National Human Rights Consultation Report (Brennan Report). Canberra: Attorney-General’s Department.
14. Crenshaw, K. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1/8: 139-167.
15. Crouch, C. 2014. “Putting Neoliberalism in its Place.” The Political Quarterly, 85 (2): 114-121.
16. Dinner, D. 2017. “Beyond ‘Best Practices’: Employment Discrimination Law in the Neoliberal Era.” Indiana Law Journal, 92 (3): 1059-1118.
17. Diversity Council Australia. 2019. Let’s Share the Care at Home and Work: A Call to Action to Reduce the Gender Pay Gap. Sydney: Diversity Council Australia Ltd. https://www.dca.org.au /sites/default/files/share_the_care_accessible .pdf Accessed 12/12/2020.
18. Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Ed M Senellart, Trans. G Burchell. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. France, A. 1898. The Red Lily (Le Lys Rouge). New York, USA: Brentanos.
20. Fredman, S. 2011. Discrimination Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn.
21. Freeman, A. D. 1982. “Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical Review.” In D. Kairys, The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York, USA: Pantheon Books.
22. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, USA: Chicago University Press.
23. Gava, J. 2010. “Dixonian Strict Legalism, Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring and Contracting in the Real World.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30 (3): 519-543.
24. Gaze, B. and Smith, B. 2016. Equality and Discrimination Law in Australia: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Glasbeek, H. 2017. Class Privilege: How Law Shelters Shareholders and Coddles Capitalism.
Toronto, Canada: Between the Lines.
26. Goldberg, T. 2002. The Racial State. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Goldblatt, B. 2017. “Claiming Women’s Social and Economic Rights in Australia.” Australian Journal of Human Rights, 23 (2): 261-283.
28. Goldblatt, B. 2015. “Intersectionality in International Anti-discrimination law: Addressing Poverty in its Complexity.” Australian Journal of Human Rights, 21 (1): 47-70.
29. Goldman, A. H. 1979. Justice and Reverse Discrimination. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
30. Graycar, R. and Morgan, J. 2010. “Equality ‘Unmodified.’” In M. Thornton (ed.) Sex Discrimination in Uncertain Times. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
31. Green, P. 1981. The Pursuit of Inequality. Oxford, UK: Martin Robertson.
32. Green, T. K. 2017. Discrimination Laundering: The Rise of Organizational Innocence and the Crisis of Equal Opportunity Law. Cambridge, Mass. USA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Hayne, J. 2020. “Australia must make Workplaces Coronavirus-safe and flatten the Unemployment Curve, Scott Morrison says.” ABC News, 5 May.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-05/coronavirus-national-cabinet-jobs-update-covid19/12216454 Accessed 10/11/2020.
35. Jarvis Thomson, J. 1977. “Preferential Hiring.” In M. Cohen, T. Nagel and T. Scanlon, Equality and Preferential Treatment. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
36. Kirby, N. 2018. “Two Concepts of Basic Equality.” Res Publica, 24: 297-318.
37. Krieger, L. 1999. “Civil Rights Perestroika: Intergroup Relations After Affirmative Action.” California Law Review, 86: 1251-1333.
38. Lawrence, C. R. III and Matsuda, M. J. 1997. We Won’t Go Back: Making the Case for Affirmative Action. Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Lawton, A. 2000. “The Meritocracy Myth and the Illusion of Equal Employment Opportunity.” Minneapolis Law Rev, 85: 587-661.
40. MacNaughton, G. 2018. “Equality Rights Beyond Neoliberal Constraints.” In G. MacNaughton and D. F. Frey, Eds. Economic and Social Rights in a Neoliberal World. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Cambridge University Press.
41. Marx, K. 1938. Critique of the Gotha Programme. New York, USA: International Publishers.
42. Moens, G. 1985. Affirmative Action: The New Discrimination. Sydney, Australia: The Centre for Independent Studies.
43. Moyn, S. 2014. “A Powerless Companion: Human Rights in the Age of Neoliberalism.” Law and Contemporary Problems, 77 (4): 147-169.
44. Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge Mass., USA: Harvard University Press.
45. O’Connell, K. 2019. “Can Law address Intersectional Sexual Harassment? The Case of Claimants with Personality Disorders.” Laws 8 (4): 34 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8040034 Accessed 12/12/2020.
46. O’Donovan, K. and E. Szyszczak. 1988. Equality and Sex Discrimination Law. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
47. O’Neil, K. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, USA: Crown.
48. Peetz, D. 2019. The Realities and Future of Work. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
49. Pender, K. 2019. Us Too? Bullying and Sexual Harassment in the Legal Profession. London: The International Bar Association (IBA).
50. Piketty, T. 2020. Capital and Ideology. Trans. A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
51. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Trans. A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
52. Purcell, M. 2008. Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures. New York, USA: Routledge.
53. Radford, G. 1985. “Equal Opportunity Programs in the Australian Public Service.” In M. Sawer (ed.) Program for Change. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
54. Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. Rees, N., S. Rice and D. Allen. 2018. Australian Anti-discrimination and Equal Opportunity Law. 3rd edn. Sydney, Australia: Federation.
56. Rice, S. 2013, “Casenote: Joan Monica Maloney v The Queen [2013] HCA 28.” Indigenous Law Bulletin, 8 (7): 28-32.
57. Rice, S. 2010. ‘And Which “Equality Act” Would that Be?’ in Margaret Thornton (ed.) Sex Discrimination in Uncertain Times. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
58. Rousseau, J. J. 1966. “A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality”, in The Social Contract and Discourses. Trans. G. D. H. Cole. London, UK: Everyman’s Library, Dent.
59. Sadurski, W. 1986. “Gerhardy v. Brown v. The Concept of Discrimination: Reflections on the Landmark Case that Wasn’t.” Sydney Law Review, 11: 5-43.


60. Scheidel, W. 2017. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
61. Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Harvard University Press.
62. Shulman, G. (2018). “Rethinking Equality”. International Social Science Journal, 67: 11-20 https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12151 Accessed 12/12/2020.
63. Somek, A. 2011. Engineering Equality: An Essay on European Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64. Strachan. G. and Burgess, J. 2000. “W(h)ither Affirmative Action Legislation in Australia?” Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 5 (2): 46-63.
65. Taylor, A. 2019. “The Conflicting Purpose of Australian Anti-Discrimination Law.” UNSW Law Journal, 42 (1): 188-210.
66. Thornton, M. 2021. “Coronavirus and the Colonisation of Private Life.” Legalities, 1 (1): 44-67.
67. Thornton, M. 2018. “Social Status: The Last Bastion of Discrimination.” Anti-Discrimination Law Review, 1 (3): 5-26.
68. Thornton, M. 2016. “The Flexible Cyborg: Work-Life Balance in Legal Practice.” Sydney Law Review, 38 (1): 1-21.
69. Thornton, M. 2015. “The Political Contingency of Sex Discrimination Legislation: The Case of Australia.” Laws, 4: 314-334.
70. Thornton, M. 2008. “Sex Discrimination, Courts and Corporate Power.” Federal Law Review, 36(1): 31-56.
71. Thornton, M. 1990. The Liberal Promise: Anti-Discrimination Legislation in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
72. Thornton, M. and Luker, T. 2010. “The New Racism in Employment Discrimination: Tales from the Global Economy.” Sydney University Law Review, 32 (1): 1-27.
73. Thornton, M. and Luker, T. 2010. “The Sex Discrimination Act and its Rocky Rite of Passage.” In M. Thornton, Ed. Sex Discrimination in Uncertain Times. Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press.
74. Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York, USA: Basic Books.
75. Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Security. Durham, N.C. USA: Duke University Press.
76. Waldron, J. 2008. “Basic Equality.” New York: “Public Law & Legal Theory”, Research Paper Series, Working Paper No 08-61, New York University.
77. Wilenski, P. 1977. Review of New South Wales Government Administration: Directions for Change. Sydney, Australia: NSW Government Printer.
78. Williams, G. 1999. Human Rights under the Australian Constitution. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
79. Wolgast, E. H. 1980. Equality and the Rights of Women. Ithaca, USA: Cornell University Press.
How to Cite
1.
Thornton M. Equality and Anti-Discrimination Legislation: An Uneasy Relationship . LiC [Internet]. 2021Aug.28 [cited 2021Sep.26];37(2). Available from: https://journals.latrobe.edu.au/index.php/law-in-context/article/view/149

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel