The Road Less Travelled: Using Administrative Data To Understand Inequalities By Sexual Orientation

Francisco Perales  
Associate Professor of Sociology at the School of Social Science The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia


Understanding the processes contributing to equality of opportunity and outcomes in contemporary societies is at the core of the discipline of sociology. This paper illustrates the value of administrative data to underpin research aimed at identifying, monitoring, and addressing socio-economic disparities between population groups. To accomplish this, I draw on three case studies of recent empirical research leveraging administrative data to examine processes contributing to the (re)production of inequalities by sexual orientation. Collectively, the three case studies exemplify how data sources that fall within the broad category of ‘administrative data’ can help social researchers generate new, policy-relevant knowledge on socio-economic inequalities, as well as robust information to contextualize public and legislative debate. The paper concludes with a discussion of the promises and challenges of using administrative data to understand inequalities by sexual orientation, as well as inequalities between other minority and majority groups.


1. Allen, D. W. 2015. “More Heat than Light: A Critical Assessment of the Same-Sex Parenting Literature, 1995–2013.” Marriage and Family Review, 51: 154-82.
2. Ambrey, C. L., Parsell, C., Spallek, M., and Robinson, R. N. 2019. “An Investigation into Repeat Requests for Charity: Evidence from the St Vincent de Paul Society Queensland, Australia.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48 (1): 91-107.
3. Andersson, G., Noack, T., Seierstad, A., and Weedon-Fekjaer, H. 2006. “The Demographics of Same-Sex Marriages in Norway and Sweden.” Demography, 43 (1): 79-98.
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2017. “Managing the Risk of Disclosure: The Five Safes Framework (ABS Confidentiality Series, Aug 2017).” Accessed 12/08/20.
5. Australian Government Productivity Commission. 2013. “Using Administrative Data to Achieve Better Policy Outcomes”. /about/governance/annual-reports/2012-13/02-annual-report-2012-13-chapter1.pdf. Accessed 12/08/20.
6. Badgett, M. V., Choi, S. K., and Wilson, B. D. 2019. “LGBT Poverty in the United States: A Study of Differences between Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Groups.” UCLA, Williams Institute.
7. Badgett, M. V., Durso, L. E., Mallory, C., and Kastanis, A. 2013. “The Business Impact of LGBT-Supportive Workplace Policies.” UCLA, Williams Institute.
8. Biblarz, T. J. and Stacey, J. 2010. “How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?” Journal of Marriage and Family, 72 (1): 3-22.
9. Boyd, D., Levy, K., and Marwick, A. 2014. “The Networked Nature of Algorithmic Discrimination.” Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays. Open Technology Institute. Accessed 12/08/20.
10. Brown, A., Chouldechova, A., Putnam-Hornstein, E., Tobin, A., and Vaithianathan, R. 2019. “Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services: A Qualitative Study of Affected Community Perspectives on Algorithmic Decision-Making in Child Welfare Services.” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-12.
11. Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
12. Card, D., Chetty, R., Feldstein, M. S., and Saez, E. 2010. “Expanding Access to Administrative Data
for Research in the United States.” Accessed 12/08/20.
13. Center for the Study of Inequality. 2017. “What Does the Scholarly Research Say about the Well-Being of Children with Gay or Lesbian Parents?” Accessed 12/08/20.
14. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Saez, E., Turner, N., and Yagan, D. 2017. “Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 23618.
15. Connelly, R., Playford, C. J., Gayle, V., and Dibben, C. 2016. “The Role of Administrative Data in the Big Data Revolution in Social Science Research.” Social Science Research, 59: 1-12.
16. DiPrete, T. A. and Eirich, G. M. 2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 271-97.
17. Drapeau, A., Boyer, R., and Diallo, F. B. 2011. “Discrepancies between Survey and Administrative Data on the Use of Mental Health Services in the General Population: Findings from a Study Conducted in Quebec.” BMC Public Health, 11 (837): 1-10.
18. Drescher, J. 2015. “Out of DSM: Depathologizing Homosexuality.” Behavioral Sciences, 5 (4): 565-75.
19. Einav, L. and Levin, J. 2014. “Economics in the Age of Big Data.” Science, 346 (6210): 1-8.
20. Fraser, B., Pierse, N., Chisholm, E., and Cook, H. 2019. “LGBTIQ+ Homelessness: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (15): 2677.
21. Gates, G. J. 2015. “Marriage and Family: LGBT Individuals and Same-Sex Couples.” The Future of Children, 25: 67-87.
22. Gravelle, T. B. and Carson, A. 2019. “Explaining the Australian Marriage Equality Vote: An Aggregate-Level Analysis.” Politics, 39 (2): 186-201.
23. Harron, K., Dibben, C., Boyd, J., Hjern, A., Azimaee, M., Barreto, M. L., and Goldstein, H. 2017. “Challenges in Administrative Data Linkage for Research.” Big Data & Society, 4 (2): 1-12.
24. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. 2009. “How Does Sexual Minority Stigma “Get Under the Skin”? A Psychological Mediation Framework.” Psychological Bulletin, 135 (5): 707-30.
25. Institute of Medicine. 2011. “The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding.” Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.
26. Kabátek, J. and Perales, F. 2020. “Academic Achievement of Children in Same-Sex-Parented and Different-Sex-Parented Families: A Population-Level Analysis of Linked Administrative Data from the Netherlands.” Demography 58 (2): 393-418.
27. Lloren, A. and Parini, L. 2017. “How LGBT-Supportive Workplace Policies Shape the Experience of Lesbian, Gay Men, and Bisexual Employees.” Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 14 (3): 289-99.
28. Manning, W. D., Fettro, M. N., and Lamidi. E. 2014. “Child Well-Being in Same-Sex Parent Families: Review of Research Prepared for American Sociological Association Amicus Brief.” Population and Research Policy Review, 33 (4): 485-502.
29. Marks, L. 2012. “Same-Sex Parenting and Children's Outcomes: A Closer Examination of the American Psychological Association's Brief on Lesbian and Gay Parenting.” Social Science Research, 41: 735-51.
30. McCall, L. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs, 30 (3): 1771-1800.
31. Mervis, J. 2017. “Data for All?” Science, 355 (6325): 573.
32. Meyer, I. H. 2003. “Prejudice, Social Stress, and
Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: Conceptual Issues and Research Evidence.” Psychological Bulletin, 129 (5): 674-97.
33. Mullan, B. P. 2017. “The Sociology of Inequality and the Rise of Neo-Inequality.” Sociological Focus, 50 (2): 105-124.
34. Ng, E. S. and Rumens, N. 2017. “Diversity and Inclusion for LGBT Workers: Current Issues and New Horizons for Research.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 34 (2): 109-20.
35. Obergefell vs. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015) (no. 14-556), 2015 WL 2473451
36. Pachankis, J.E., Hatzenbuehler, M.L., Hickson, F., Weatherburn, P., Berg, R.C., Marcus, U., et al. 2015. “Hidden from Health: Structural Stigma, Sexual Orientation Concealment, and HIV across 38 Countries in the European MSM Internet Survey.” AIDS, 29 (10): 1239-46.
37. Parliament of Australia. 2018. “The Question of Sexual Orientation... Something for Census 2021?” Accessed 12/08/20.
38. Parsell, C., Petersen, M., and Culhane, D. 2017. “Cost Offsets of Supportive Housing: Evidence for Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work, 47 (5): 1534-53.
39. Perales, F. 2016. “The Costs of Being “Different”: Sexual Identity and Subjective Wellbeing over the Life Course.” Social Indicators Research, 127 (2): 827-49.
40. Perales, F. 2019. “The Health and Wellbeing of Australian Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual people: A Systematic Assessment Using a Longitudinal National Sample.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 43 (3): 281-87.
41. Perales, F. and Campbell, A. 2018. “Who Supports Equal Rights for Same-Sex Couples? Evidence from Australia.” Family Matters, 100: 28-41.
42. Perales, F. and Campbell, A. 2019. “Early Roots of Sexual-Orientation Health Disparities: Associations between Sexual Attraction, Health
and Wellbeing in a National Sample of Australian Adolescents.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 73 (10): 954-62.
43. Perales, F. and Todd, A. 2018. “Structural Stigma and the Health and Wellbeing of Australian LGB Populations: Exploiting Geographic Variation in the Results of the 2017 Same-Sex Marriage Plebiscite.” Social Science & Medicine, 208 (July): 190-99.
44. Perales, F., Simpson Reeves, L., Plage, S. and Baxter, J. 2020. “The Family Lives of Australian Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual People: A Review of the Literature and a Research Agenda.” Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 17 (1): 43-60.
45. Piketty, T. and Saez, E. 2014. “Inequality in the Long Run.” Science, 344 (6186): 838-43.
46. Pride in Diversity. 2019. “Australian Workplace Equality Index 2019: The Definitive Benchmark on Australian LGBTIQ Workplace Inclusion.” /2015/08/AWEI_Report_2019_Screen.pdf. Accessed 12/08/20.
47. Regnerus, M. 2012. “How Different are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study.” Social Science Research, 41: 752-70.
48. Rosenfeld, M. 2010 “Nontraditional Families and Childhood Progress through School.” Demography, 47 (3): 755-75.
49. Saxby, K., Sonja, C., and Petrie, D. 2020. “Structural Stigma and Sexual Orientation Disparities in Healthcare Use: Evidence from Australian Census-Linked-Administrative Data.” Social Science & Medicine, 255 (June): 1-11.
50. Sexton, A., Shepherd, E., Duke-Williams, O., and Eveleigh, A. 2017. “A Balance of Trust in the Use of Government Administrative Data.” Archival Science, 17 (4): 305-30.
51. Shepherd, E., Sexton, A., Duke-Williams, O., and Eveleigh, A. 2019. “Risk Identification and Management for the Research Use of Government Administrative Data.” Records Management Journal, 30 (1): 101-23.
52. Short, M. E., Goetzel, R. Z., Pei, X., Tabrizi, M. J., Ozminkowski, R. J., Gibson, T. B., ... and Wilson, M. G. 2009. “How Accurate are Self-Reports? An Analysis of Self-Reported Healthcare Utilization and Absence when Compared to Administrative Data.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51 (7): 786-96.
53. Uhrig, N. 2015. “Sexual Orientation and Poverty in the UK: A Review and Top-Line Findings from the UK Household Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 5 (1): 23–72.
54. Valfort, M. A. 2017. “LGBTI in OECD countries: A review.” Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
55. Waite, S. and Denier, N. 2019. “A Research Note on Canada’s LGBT Data Landscape: Where We Are and What the Future Holds.” Canadian Review of Sociology, 56 (1): 93-117.
56. Watts, D. J. 2017. “Should Social Science Be More Solution-Oriented?” Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (1): 1-5.
57. Western, M. 2019. “How to Increase the Relevance and Use of Social and Behavioral Science: Lessons for Policy-Makers, Researchers and Others.” Justice Evaluation Journal, 2 (1): 18-34.
58. Wiik, K. A., Seierstad, A., and Noack, T. 2014. “Divorce in Norwegian Same‐Sex Marriages and Registered Partnerships: The Role of Children.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 76 (5): 919-29.
59. Wilson, T., Shalley, F. and Perales, F. 2020. “The Geography of Australia’s Marriage Law Postal Survey Outcome.” Area, 52 (10): 164-175.
60. Zurbrügg, L. and Miner, K. N. 2016. “Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Workplace Incivility: Who is Most Targeted and Who is Most Harmed?” Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (565): 1-12.
How to Cite
Perales F. The Road Less Travelled: Using Administrative Data To Understand Inequalities By Sexual Orientation . LiC [Internet]. 2021Aug.29 [cited 2022May24];37(2):74-7. Available from:

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel