Pay Transparency and Labor Market Justice

Daniel Halliday  
Associate Professor in Political Philosophy, Historical, and Philosophical Studies University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Share:

Abstract

I argue that a general initial case for pay transparency can be made given the role played by transparency of information about prices in bringing markets closer to the ideal of competition or equilibrium price. This initial case might then be limited or enhanced depending on more specific considerations about the status of information about pay in particular. Privacy considerations seem to count against pay transparency, but I argue here that the context of pay information lacks some features present in other contexts in which appeals to privacy have force. Building on work by Estlund, Moriarty, Caulfield, and others, I argue that pay transparency may be favoured by considerations relating to personal autonomy in labour markets. Finally, I argue that pay transparency may contribute towards the realization of conditions of publicity, particularly relating to the value of citizens’ assurance about each other’s tax compliance.

References

  1. Bobek, D. Roberts, R. and Sweeney, T. 2007. “The Social Norms of Tax Compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore and the United States.” Journal of Business Ethics, 74 (1): 49–64
  2. Brennan, G and Pettit, P. 1990. “Unveiling the Vote.” British Journal of Political Science, 20 (3): 311–333
  3. Caulfield, M. 2020. “Pay Secrecy, Discrimination, and Autonomy.” Journal of Business Ethics, (2020: online view)
  4. Cohen, G.A. 2001. “Why Not Socialism?” in E. Broadbent (ed.) Democratic Equality: What Went Wrong? Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press: 58–78.
  5. Emerton, P. and James, K. 2018. “The Justice of the Tax Base and the Case for Income Tax” in M. Bhandari (ed.) The Philosophical Foundations of Tax Law. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press
  6. Estlund, C. 2014. “Extending the Case for Work-place Transparency to Information About Pay.” UC Irvine Law Review, 4 (2): 781–800
  7. Gheaus, A. and Herzog, L. 2016. “The Goods of Work (Other Than Money!)” Journal of Social Philosophy, 47 (1): 70–89
  8. Heath, J. 2014. Morality, Competition and The Firm. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press
  9. Hollander-Blumoff, R. and Bodie, M. 2021. “The Market as Negotiation.” Notre Dame Law Review, 96 (3): 1257–1317
  10. Lever, A. 2012. On Privacy. London, UK: Routledge
  11. Lobel, O. 2020. “Knowledge Pays: Reversing In-formation Flows and the Future of Pay Equity.” Columbia Law Review, 120 (3): 547–611
  12. Marmour, A. 2015. “What is the Right to Privacy?” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 43 (1): 3–26
  13. Moriarty, J. 2018. “Against Pay Secrecy.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35 (4): 689–704.
  14. Ramachandran, G. 2012. “Pay Transparency.” Penn State Law Review, 116 (4): 1043–1079.
  15. Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism (expanded edition). New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
  16. Reilly, A. 2019. “Why New Zealand Employers should be subject to Mandatory Pay Transparency.” Journal of the Australasian Law Academic Association, 12: 86–95.
  17. Roemer, J. 2017. “Socialism Revised.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 45 (3): 261–315.
  18. Sample, R. 2003. Exploitation: What It Is and Why It’s Wrong. New York, NY, USA: Rowman & Littlefield
  19. Satz, D. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be For Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York, USA: Oxford University Press
  20. Singer, A. 2019. The Form of The Firm: A Norma-tive Political Theory of The Corporation. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press
How to Cite
1.
Halliday D. Pay Transparency and Labor Market Justice . LiC [Internet]. 2021Aug.28 [cited 2021Nov.29];37(2):27-6. Available from: https://journals.latrobe.edu.au/index.php/law-in-context/article/view/147

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel