Knowledge Graphs: Trust, Privacy, and Transparency from a Legal Governance Approach

Carlos Laufer | Bio
Pompeu Casanovas
La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
Share:

Abstract

This paper presents the Knowledge Graph Usage framework, which allows the introduction of Knowledge Graph features to support Trust, Privacy, Transparency and Accountability concerns regarding the use of its contents by applications. A real-world example is presented and used to illustrate how the framework can be used. This article also shows how knowledge graphs can be linked to the elements of legal governance. Thus, it is an invitation to dialogue for legal and Law & Society scholars who might be interested in how the evolution of the web of data and computational sciences intersects with their own discipline.

 

References

  1. A. Hogan, E. Blomqvist, M. Cochez, C. d’Amato, G. de Melo, C. Gutierrez, J. E. L. Gayo, S. Kirrane, S. Neumaier, A. Polleres, R. Navigli, A. N. Ngomo, S. M. Rashid, A. Rula, L. Schmelzeisen, J. F. Sequeda, S. Staab, and A. Zimmermann. “Knowledge Graphs”. arXiv. abs/2003.02320. 2020.
  2. Almendra, V. D. S., and Schwabe, D. 2006. Trust policies for semantic web repositories. In Proceedings of 2nd International Semantic Web Policy Workshop (SWPW’06), at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC, pp. 17-31.
  3. Angella J., Kim, K. and Johnson, K.P. 2016. “Power of consumers using social media: Examining the influences of brand-related user-generated content on Facebook”, Computers in Human Behavior, 58: 98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.047 .
  4. Artz, D., Gil, Y. 2007. “A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web”, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5 82): 58-71. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826807000133
  5. Australian Government. 2019. Department of the Treasury. Regulating in the digital age: Government Response and Implementation Roadmap for the Digital Platforms Inquiry (Government Response, December). https://treasury.gov.au/publication/p2019-41708
  6. Australian Government. 2020. Attorney-General’s Department. Privacy Act Review. Issues Paper. October, https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2020-10/apo-nid309253.pdf
  7. Berners-Lee, T., Connolly, D., Kagal, L., Scharf, Y., Hendler, J. 2008. “N3Logic: A Logical Framework for the World Wide Web”, Theory Pract. Log. Program. 8: 249–269.
  8. Bernstein, E. 2017. “Making Transparency Transparent: The Evolution of Observation in Management Theory”, Academy of Management Annals 11 (1): 217 – 66.
  9. Bizer, C. and Cyganiak, R. 2009. “Quality-Driven Information Filtering Using the WIQA Policy Framework”, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 7: 1-10. http://www.websemanticsjournal.org/index.php/ps/article/view/157/155
  10. Blasi-Casagran, C. 2014. “The EU Role in Shaping Global Data Privacy Standards”, PrivOn2015 https://sites.google.com/site/privon2015/accepted-papers
  11. Blasi-Casagran, C. 2016. Global data protection in the field of law enforcement: an EU perspective. London: Routledge.
  12. Cameron. K. 2004. December- “The Seven laws of the Internet”. http://www.identityblog.com/stories/2004/12/09/thelaws.html
  13. Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Wang, R.C., Hruschka Jr., E.R., Mitchell, T.M. 2010. “Coupled semi-supervised learning for information extraction”. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 101–110.
  14. Casanovas, P., Arraiza, J., Melero, F., González-Conejero, J., Molcho, G. and Cuadros, M. 2014. “Fighting Organized Crime Through Open Source Intelligence: Regulatory Strategies of the CAPER Project”. In Hoekstra, R. ed., Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2014. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 189-198.
  15. Casanovas, P., Jorge González-Conejero, J., de Koker, L. 2017. "Legal compliance by design (LCbD) and through design (LCtD): preliminary survey." TERECOM@JURIX 2017,
  16. Casanovas, P., Palmirani, M., Peroni, S., Van Engers, T. and Vitali, F. 2016. “Semantic web for the legal domain: the next step”. Semantic Web, 7(3): 213-227.
  17. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. Social Trust: A Cognitive Approach. In: Castelfranchi, C., Yao-Hua Tan (Eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Dartmouth: Springer-Verlag (2001).
  18. Castells, M. 2010. The Rise of the network society (2 ed.). Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell Publ. Inc.
  19. Cavoukian, A. 2006. “7 Laws of Identity: The Case for Privacy-Embedded Laws of Identity in the Digital Age”, Technology, Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner, October, pp. 1-24.
  20. Cavoukian, A. 2010. “Privacy by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles. Implementation and Mapping of Fair information Practices. Information and Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada.
  21. Colesky, M., Hoepman, J.H. and Hillen, C. 2016, “A critical analysis of privacy design strategies”. In 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), IEEE, pp. 33-40.
  22. Council of the European Union, European Parliament, 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. General Data Protection Regulation”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 .
  23. Davenport, T.H. and Beck, J.C. 2001. The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business Press.
  24. Ebner, N. and Zeleznikow, J. 2016. “No sheriff in town: governance for online dispute resolution”, Negotiation Journal, 32(4): 297-323.
  25. Ehrlinger, L. and Wöß, W. 2016. “Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs”, SEMANTiCS, CEUR 1695, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1695/paper4.pdf
  26. Erxleben, F., Günther, M., Krötzsch, M., Mendez, J., and Vrandečic, D. 2014. “Introducing Wikidata to the Linked Data Web”, Proc. ISWC 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8796. Cham: Springer.
  27. European Union. 2012. Charter of Fundamental Rights of The European Union. (2012/C 326/02) 26.10.2012 Official Journal of the European Union C 326/391. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT
  28. Danezis, G., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Hansen, M., Hoepman, J.-H, Metayer, D.L., Tirtea, R. and Schiffner, S. 2014. Privacy and Data Protection by Design – From policy to engineering. Technical report, ENISA, December. ISBN 978-92-9204-108-3, DOI 10.2824/38623. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/identity-and-trust/library/deliverables/privacy-and-data-protection-by-design
  29. Gandon, F. 2018. “A Survey of the First 20 Years of Research on Semantic Web and Linked Data”, Revue des Sciences et Technologies de l’Information - Série ISI : Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, Lavoisier, https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01935898/document
  30. Gerck, E. 1998. Toward Real-World Models of Trust: Reliance on Received Information. Report MCWG-Jan22-1998, http://www.safevote.com/papers/trustdef.htm
  31. Golden, P. and Shaw, R., 2016. “Nanopublication beyond the sciences: the PeriodO period gazetteer”. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, p.e44. https://peerj.com/articles/cs-44/
  32. González-Fuster, G. 2014. The emergence of personal data protection as a fundamental right of the EU, LGT Vol. 16. Cham: Springer Science & Business.
  33. Grandison, T., and Sloman, M. 2000. “A survey of trust in internet applications”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 3 (4): 2-16.
  34. Groth, P., Gibson, A., and Velterop. J. 2010. "The anatomy of a nanopublication." Information Services & Use 30 (1-2): 51-56.
  35. Hashmi, M., Casanovas, P. and de Koker, L. 2018. “Legal Compliance Through Design: Preliminary Results of a Literature Survey”. TERECOM2018@JURIX, Technologies for Regulatory Compliance http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2309/06.pdf
  36. Hashmi, M., Governatori, G., Lam, H.P. and Wynn, M.T. 2018. “Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead”, Knowledge and Information Systems, 57(1): 79-133.
  37. Heimstäd, M., Dobusch, L. 2018. “Politics of Disclosure: Organizational Transparency as Multiactor Negotiation”, Public Administration Review 78 (5): 727-738
  38. Hoepman, J.-H. 2018. “Privacy Design Strategies” (The Little Blue Book). https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/195397/195397.pdf?sequence=1
  39. Hoepman, J.-H. 2014. "Privacy Design Strategies (extended abstract)", in N. Cuppens-Boulahia et al. (Eds.), ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection - 29th IFIP TC 11 International Conference, SEC 2014, Marrakech, Morocco, June 2-4, 2014. Proceedings. Springer 2014 IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pp. 446-459.
  40. Kejriwal, M. 2019. Domain-Specific Knowledge Graph Construction. Cham: Brief Springer International Publishing
  41. Koops, B.J. and Leenes, R. 2014. “Privacy regulation cannot be hardcoded. A critical comment on the ‘privacy by design’provision in data-protection law”. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 28(2): 159-171.
  42. Kuhn, T., Meroño-Peñuela, A., Malic, A., Poelen, J.H., Hurlbert, A.H., Centeno, E., Furlong, L.I., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Chichester, C., Banda, J.M., Willighagen, E.L., Ehrhart, F., Evelo, C.T., Malas, T.B., & Dumontier, M. 2018. Nanopublications: A Growing Resource of Provenance-Centric Scientific Linked Data. CoRR, abs/1809.06532. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.06532.pdf
  43. Langheinrich, M. 2001. “Privacy by design—principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems. In G.D. Abowd, B. Brumitt, and S. Shafer (Eds.), International conference on Ubiquitous Computing, LNCS 2201, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 273-291.
  44. Laufer, C, Schwabe, D. 2017.” On Modeling Political Systems to Support the Trust Process, Proceedings of the Privacy Online”, PrivON 2017, co-located with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017) Vienna, Austria, Out. 2017, p.1 – 16 http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1951/PrivOn2017_paper_7.pdf
  45. Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., Jentzsch, A., Kontokostas, D., Mendes, P.N., Hellmann, S., Morsey, M., van Kleef, P., Auer, S., and Bizer, C.. 2013. “DBpedia-A large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia”, Semantic Web Journal 6(2): 167–195.
  46. Lenat, D.B. 1995. “CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure”, Communications ACM 38(11): 33–38.
  47. Martín-Chozas, P., Montiel-Ponsoda, E. and Rodríguez-Doncel, V. 2019. “Language resources as linked data for the legal domain” In, G. Peruginelli, S. Faro (Eds), Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 170-180.
  48. Marwick, A. andLewis, R.. 2017. “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online.” Data & Society Research Institute, New York. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf
  49. McCrae, J.P., Bosque-Gil, J., Gracia, J., Buitelaar, P. and Cimiano, P. 2017. “The Ontolex-Lemon model: development and applications”. In Proceedings of eLex 2017 Conference, pp. 19-21.
  50. Meijer, A. 2013. “Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency”, Public Administration Review 73 (3): 429 – 439.
  51. Miller, G. A. 1995. “WordNet: Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H A lexical database for English”, Communications ACM 38 (11): 39–41.
  52. Norris, C., De Hert, P., L'Hoiry, X., Galetta, A. (Eds.) 2017. The Unaccountable State of Surveillance. Cham: Springer.
  53. Paci, F., Squicciarini, A., Zannone, N. 2018. “Survey on Access Control for Community-Centered Collaborative Systems”. ACM Comput. Surv. 51 (6): 1–6.
  54. Pagallo, U., Aurucci, P., Casanovas, P., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Schafer, B. and Valcke, P., 2019. AI4People-On Good AI Governance: 14 Priority Actions, a SMART Model of Governance, and a Regulatory Toolbox. https://www.eismd.eu/pdf/AI4PEOPLE%20On%20Good%20Ai%20Governance%202019.pdf
  55. Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P. and Madelin, R. 2019. “The middle-out approach: assessing models of legal governance in data protection, artificial intelligence, and the Web of Data”. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 7 (1): 1-25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20508840.2019.1664543
  56. Peczenik, A. 2004. Scientia Juris. In A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, Vol. 4. Dartmouth: Springer.
  57. Pfitzmann, A. and Hansen, M. 2010. “A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization: Anonymity, unlinkability, undetectability, unobservability, pseudonymity, and identity management”. V.034. http://www.maroki.de/pub/dphistory/2010_Anon_Terminology_v0.34.pdf
  58. Pinyol, I.; Sabater-Mir, J.; Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review 40:1–25 DOI 10.1007/s10462-011-9277-z (2013)
  59. Poblet, M., Casanovas, P. and Rodríguez-Doncel, V. 2019. Linked Democracy: Foundations, tools, and applications. Springer Law Brief n. 750. Cham: Springer Nature.
  60. Rastogi, N., Gloria, M.J.K. and Hendler, J. 2017. “Security and Privacy of performing Data Analytics in the cloud-A three-way handshake of Technology, Policy, and Management”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06828.
  61. Rehm, G., Galanis, D., Labropoulou, P., Piperidis, S., Welß, M., Usbeck, R., Köhler, J., Deligiannis, M., Gkirtzou, K., Fischer, J. and Chiarcos, C., 2020. “Towards an Interoperable Ecosystem of AI and LT Platforms: A Roadmap for the Implementation of Different Levels of Interoperability”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08355.
  62. Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  63. Rodriguez-Doncel, V., Santos, C., Casanovas, P. and Gomez-Perez, A. (2016). “Legal aspects of linked data–The European framework”. Computer Law & Security Review, 32 (6): 799-813.
  64. Rodríguez-Doncel, V., Santos, C., Casanovas, P. and Gómez-Pérez, A. (2015) “A Linked Term Bank of Copyright-Related Terms”. In JURIX-2015, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 91-100.
  65. Sartor, G. 2005. Legal reasoning. In A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 5. Dartmouth: Springer.
  66. Schudson, M. 2015. The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency, 1945-1973. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  67. Schwab, K., 2017. The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
  68. Schwabe, D., Laufer, C., and Busson, A. 2019. “Building Knowledge Graphs About Political Agents in the Age of Misinformation, http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.11408
  69. Sherchan, W. Nepal, S., and Paris, C. 2013. “A Survey of trust in social networks”, ACM Comput. Surv. 45, 4, Article 47 , August.
  70. Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H. 2011. “Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review”, MIS Quarterly 35: 989–1015.
  71. Speer, R. and Havasi, C. 2012. "Representing General Relational Knowledge” In ConceptNet 5, Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12), ELRA, pp. 3679-3686.
  72. Such, J.M. and Criado, N. 2018. “Multiparty Privacy in Social Media”, Communications ACM. 61: 74–81.
  73. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., and Weikum, G.. 2007. “YAGO: a core of semantic knowledge unifying WordNet and Wikipedia”. In 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 697–706.
  74. Tavani, H.T. and Moor, J.H. 2001. “Privacy Protection, Control of Information, and Privacy-enhancing Technologies”, SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 31: 6–11.
  75. Tavani, H.T. 2007. “Philosophical Theories of Privacy: Implications for an Adequate Online Privacy Policy”, Metaphilosophy 38: 1–22.
  76. Torra, V. 2017. Data Privacy: Foundations, New Developments and the Big Data Challenge. Cham: Springer Nature.
  77. United Nations, Universal Bill of Human Rights, Resolution A/RES/217(III) http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=14O243550E15G.60956&profile=voting&uri=full=3100023~!909326~!67
  78. US Privacy Protection Study Commission. 1977. Personal Privacy in an Information Society. https://epic.org/privacy/ppsc1977report/
  79. US Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. 1973. Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens. https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/records-computers-and-rights-citizens
  80. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M. 2014. “Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledge base”, Communications ACM 57 (10): 78–85.
  81. Westin, A. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.
  82. Zou, L., and Özsu, M.T. 2017. "Graph-based RDF data management", Data Science and Engineering 2 (1): 56-70.
  83. Zuboff, S., 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Barack Obama's Books of 2019. NY: Profile Books.
How to Cite
1.
Schwabe D, Laufer C, Casanovas P. Knowledge Graphs: Trust, Privacy, and Transparency from a Legal Governance Approach. LiC [Internet]. 2020Dec.26 [cited 2021Jan.23];37(1):1-19. Available from: https://journals.latrobe.edu.au/index.php/law-in-context/article/view/126

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel