Sovereigns, Viruses, and the Law: The Normative Challenges of Pandemic in Today’s Information Societies

The Normative Challenges of Pandemic in Today’s Information Societies

Ugo Pagallo   | Bio
University of Turin
Share:

Abstract

The paper examines the legal and political impact of the Covid-19 crisis, drawing the attention to fundamental questions on authority and political legitimacy, coercion and obligation, power and cooperation. National states and sovereign governments have had and still will have a crucial role in re-establishing the public health sector and addressing the colossal challenges of economic re-construction. Scholars have accordingly discussed the set of legal means displayed during this crisis: emergency decrees, lockdowns, travel bans, and generally speaking, powers of the state of exception. The aim of this paper is to stress the limits of such perspectives on powers of national governments and sovereigns, in order to illustrate what goes beyond such powers. Focus should be on the ontological, epistemic and normative constraints that affect today’s rights and duties of national states. Such constraints correspond to a class of problems that is complex, often transnational, and increasingly data-driven. In addition, we should not overlook the lessons learnt from such fields, as environmental law and internet governance, anti-terrorism and transnational business law, up to the regulation of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Such fields show that legal co-regulation and mechanisms of coordination and cooperation complement the traditional powers of national governments even in the times of the mother of all pandemics. The Covid-19 crisis has been often interpreted as if this were the last chapter of an on-going history about the Leviathan and its bio-powers. It is not. The crisis regards the end of the first chapter on the history of today’s information societies.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio (2004) State of Exception, translated by Kevin Attell. The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Allen, Colin, Gary Varner, and Jason Zinser (2000) Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12: 251–261.
  3. Andrighetto, Giulia, Governatori, Guido, Noriega, Pablo and Leon van der Torre, Normative Multi-agent Systems, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2013, vol. 4.
  4. Aylmer, Carey (2020) Coronavirus: A Political Tool of the West, Guardian (Sydney), Issue 1906, March 9. Available at https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=024036551549530;res=IELAPA.
  5. Blasimme, Alberto and Effy Vayena (2019) The Ethics of AI in Biomedical Research, Patient Care and Public Health, April 9. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=.
  6. Bogdandy, Armin von and Pedro Villareal (2020) International Law on Pandemic Response: A First Stocktaking in Light of the Coronavirus Crisis, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL), Research Paper No. 2020-07. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3561650.
  7. Brownsword, R. and Karen Yeung (eds.) (2007) Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes, London: Hart.
  8. Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchy Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Buranyi, Stephen (2020) The WHO v. Coronavirus: Why It Can’t Tackle the Pandemic, The Guardian, April 10. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/news/2020/apr/10/world-health-organization-who-v-coronavirus-why-it-cant-handle-pandemic.
  10. Casanovas, Pompeu, Mendelson, Danuta and Marta Poblet, A Linked Democracy Approach for Regulating Public Health Data, Health and Technology, 2017, 7 (4): 519-537.
  11. Chaitin, Gregory (2005) Meta-math! The Quest for Ω, New York: Pantheon.
  12. Floridi, Luciano (2008) Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope, in van den Hoven J. and Weckert J. (eds.) Moral Philosophy and Information Technology, 40-65, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  13. Floridi, Luciano (2014) The Fourth Revolution. Oxford: OUP.
  14. Floridi, Luciano (2020) The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU, Philosophy & Technology, 33(3): 369-378.
  15. Floridi, Luciano (ed.) (2015) The Onlife Manifesto. Dordrecht: Springer.
  16. Floridi, Luciano and Jeff Sanders (2004) On the morality of artificial agents, Minds and Machines 14(3): 349–379.
  17. Floridi, Luciano, J. Cowls, M. Beltrametti, R. Chatila, P. Chazerand, V. Dignum, Ch. Luetge, R. Madelin, U. Pagallo, F. Rossi, B. Schafer, P. Valcke and E. Vayena (2018) AI4People - An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations, Minds and Machines, 28(4): 689-707.
  18. Floridi, Luciano, Luetge, Christoph, Pagallo, Ugo et al. (2019) Key Ethical Challenges in the European Medical Information Framework, Minds & Machines, 29: 355–371.
  19. Foucault, Michel (1979) The Birth of Biopolitics, trans. Graham Burchell, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  20. Foucault, Michel (1991) Governmentality, trans. Rosi Braidotti and revised by Colin Gordon, in Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  21. Fredericks, Joel, Caldwell, Glenda and Martin Tomitsch, Middle-out Design: Collaborative Community Engagement in Urban HCI. In OzCHI ’16 Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 200-204, Launceston, TAS, 2016.
  22. Gibbs, A.J. and M.J. Gibbs (2006) A broader definition of the “virus species”, Archives of Virology, 151: 1419–1422.
  23. Gostin, Lawrence O. and James G. Hodge Jr. (2020) US Emergency Legal Responses to Novel Coronavirus: Balancing Public Health and Civil Liberties, Jama, February 13. Available at doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2025.
  24. Gutting, Gary and Oksala, Johanna (2019) Michel Foucault, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/foucault/>.
  25. Harari, Yuval Noah (2020) The world after Coronavirus, The Financial Times, March 20. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75.
  26. Hildebrandt, Mireille and Serge Gutwirth (eds.) (2009) Profiling the European Citizens, Dordrecht: Springer.
  27. Hobbes, Thomas (1999) Leviathan, R. Tuck (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. King, A Adams, M., Lefkowitz, E. and E. Carstens 2012) Virus Taxonomy, in A. King et al. (eds), Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxobomy of Viruses, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  29. Lessig, Lawrence (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
  30. Marx, Gary (2002) What’s New About the “New Surveillance”? Classifying for Change and Continuity, Surveillance & Society 1(1): 9-29.
  31. Mbembe, Achille (2003) Necropolitics, Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40.
  32. Murray, Andrew D. (2007) The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment. New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
  33. Pagallo, Ugo (2005) Introduzione alla filosofia digitale. Torino: Giappichelli.
  34. Pagallo, Ugo (2011) Designing Data Protection Safeguards Ethically, Information, 2(2): 247-265.
  35. Pagallo, Ugo (2013a) The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Dordrecht: Springer.
  36. Pagallo, Ugo (2013b) Online Security and the Protection of Civil Rights: A Legal Overview, Philosophy & Technology, 26(4): 381-395.
  37. Pagallo, Ugo (2015a) Good Onlife Governance: On Law, Spontaneous Orders, and Design. In Luciano Floridi (ed.), The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, pp. 161-177. Dordrecht: Springer.
  38. Pagallo, Ugo (2015b) The Realignment of the Sources of the Law and their Meaning in an Information Society, Philosophy & Technology 28(1): 57-73.
  39. Pagallo, Ugo (2015c) Cyber Force and the Role of Sovereign States in Informational Warfare, Philosophy & Technology, 28(3): 407-425.
  40. Pagallo, Ugo and Massimo Durante (2016) The Pros and Cons of Legal Automation and its Governance, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(2): 323-334.
  41. Pagallo, Ugo, Casanovas, Pompeu and Robert Madelin (2019) The Middle-out Approach: Assessing models of legal governance in data protection, artificial intelligence, and the Web of Data, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 7(1): 1-25, DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2019.1664543
  42. Poblet, Marta, Casanovas, Pompeu and Victor Rodríguez-Doncel, Linked Democracy. Springer, Dordrecht, 2019.
  43. Post, David (2009) In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace, New York: Oxford University Press.
  44. Reed, Chis (2012) Making Laws for Cyberspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. Reidenberg, Joel R. (1998) Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology, Texas Law Review, 76(3): 553-594.
  46. Roach, Kent (2011) The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-terrorism. Cambridge University Press.
  47. Rosenau, J.N. and E.O. Czempiel (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Runciman, David (2020) Coronavirus has not suspended politics – it has revealed the nature of power, The Guardian, March 27. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/27/coronavirus-politics-lockdown-hobbes.
  49. Schmitt, Carl (1985) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. by George D. Schwab, MIT Press.
  50. Schörindger, Erwin (1944) What’s Life?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Solum, Lawrence B. (2009), Models of Internet Governance, in L. A. Bygrave and J. Bing (eds.), Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions, pp. 48-91. New York: Oxford University Press.
  52. Stock, James H. (2020) Coronavirus Data Gaps and the Policy Response to the Novel Coronavirus, March 23. Available at http://www.igmchicago.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/coronavirus_shutdown_dynamics_econ_v2.pdf.
  53. Taddeo, Mariarosaria (2018) The Limits of Deterrence Theory in Cyberspace, Philosophy & Technology, 31: 339–355.
  54. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Rev. and expanded ed. New York: Penguin Books.
  55. Thiselton, Anthony C. (2009) Hermeneutics: An Introduction. Eerdmans Publishing.
  56. Van Regenmortel, Marc H.V., Ackermann, Hans=Wolfgang, Calisher, Charles H. et al. (2013) Virus species polemics: 14 senior virologists oppose a proposed change to the ICTV definition of virus species. Archives of Virology, 158: 1115–1119.
  57. Von Neumann, John (1951) The general and logical theory of automata, Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon Symposium, edited by L.A. Jeffress, pp. 1-31. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  58. Wiener, Norbert (1954) The Human Use of Human Beings, Houghton Mifflin, second edition.
  59. Zuboff, Shoshana (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, New York: Public Affairs.
How to Cite
1.
Pagallo U. Sovereigns, Viruses, and the Law. LiC [Internet]. 2020Sep.30 [cited 2020Oct.21];37(1):1-13. Available from: https://journals.latrobe.edu.au/index.php/law-in-context/article/view/117

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel